A longitudinal prospective cohort study of health-related quality of life assessment in outpatient adults with post-COVID-19 conditions.

Background: Few studies have reported the long-term effects of post-COVID-19 condition (PCC) on health-related quality of life (HRQoL). We aim to assess HRQoL in outpatient adults with PCC over a 2-year period. Methods: This prospective longitudinal cohort study compared 413 PCC participants (cases) to 520 COVID-19-positive participants who recovered (controls). HRQoL was assessed with the EuroQol 5-Dimension 5-Level preference-based questionnaire (EQ-5D-5L) and fitness and frailty with the Clinical Frailty Scale (CFS) at each visit for up to 24 months. Results: Among a total of 933 participants, 413 (42.3%) met the definition of PCC (cases) and 520 (55.7%) did not (controls). Overall, there was a significant difference in EQ-5D-5L index score from 3 months post-infection up to 18 months between cases and controls (p < 0.001). This score continued to decline up to 18 months in the PCC group only. Most impaired EQ-5D-5L dimensions at 12 months in the PCC group included pain/discomfort, anxiety/depression, and usual activities. Conclusions: This is one of the first studies to report 2-year alterations of HRQoL in outpatients with PCC. Our study highlights the need for continued monitoring for PCC long-term consequences. Given the high proportion of PCC participants experiencing anxiety/depression problems, further studies are needed to specifically address mental health in this population.

Historique: Peu d'études traitent des effets à long terme de l'affection post-COVID-19 (APC) sur la qualité de vie liée à la santé (QVLS). Les chercheurs ont évalué la QVLS des adultes ambulatoires atteints d'une APC sur une période de deux ans. Méthodologie: Dans la présente étude de cohorte longitudinale prospective, les chercheurs ont comparé 413 participants atteints d'une APC (les cas) à 520 participants ayant obtenu un résultat positif à la COVID-19 qui se sont rétablis (les sujets témoins). Ils ont évalué la QVLS à l'aide du questionnaire EQ-5D-5L, de même que la condition physique et la fragilité à l'aide de l'échelle de fragilité clinique (CFS) lors de chaque rendez-vous sur une période maximale de 24 mois. Résultats: Sur un total de 933 participants, 413 (42,3 %) respectaient la définition d'APC (les cas) et 520 (55,7 %) ne la respectaient pas (sujets témoins). Dans l'ensemble, les chercheurs ont constaté une différence significative du score de l'indice EQ-5D-5L entre trois mois et un maximum de 18 mois suivant l'infection entre les cas et les sujets témoins (p < 0,001). C'est seulement au sein du groupe atteint d'une APC que ce score a continué de baisser pendant une période maximale de 18 mois. La douleur et les malaises, l'anxiété et la dépression et les activités habituelles étaient les dimensions de l'EQ-5D-5L les plus touchées au bout de 12 mois dans le groupe atteint d'une. APC Conclusions: La présente étude est l'une des premières à rendre compte des transformations de la QVLS chez les patients ambulatoires atteints d'une APC sur deux ans. Elle démontre la nécessité d'une surveillance continue des conséquences à long terme de l'APC. Étant donné la forte proportion de participants atteints d'une APC qui éprouvent des troubles d'anxiété et de dépression, d'autres études s'imposent pour évaluer expressément les problèmes de santé mentale au sein de cette population.

Ultrasound guidance for transfemoral access in coronary procedures: an individual participant-level data metaanalysis from the femoral ultrasound trialist collaboration.

BACKGROUND: Randomised controlled trials of ultrasound (US)-guided transfemoral access (TFA) for coronary procedures have shown mixed results. AIMS: We aimed to compare US-guided versus non-US-guided TFA from randomised data in an individual participant-level data (IPD) meta-analysis. METHODS: We completed a systematic review and an IPD meta-analysis of all randomised controlled trials comparing US-guided versus non-US-guided TFA for coronary procedures. We performed a one-stage mixed-model meta-analysis using the intention-to-treat population from included trials. The primary outcome was a composite of major vascular complications or major bleeding within 30 days. RESULTS: A total of 2,441 participants (1,208 US-guided, 1,233 non-US-guided) from 4 randomised clinical trials were included. The mean age was 65.5 years, 27.0% were female, and 34.5% underwent a percutaneous coronary intervention. The incidence of major vascular complications or major bleeding (34/1,208 [2.8%] vs 55/1,233 [4.5%]; odds ratio [OR] 0.61, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.39-0.94; p=0.026) was lower in the US-guided TFA group. In the prespecified subgroup of participants who received a vascular closure device, those randomised to US-guided TFA experienced a reduction in the primary outcome (2.1% vs 5.6%; OR 0.36, 95% CI: 0.19-0.69), while no benefit for US guidance was observed in the subgroup without vascular closure devices (4.1% vs 3.3%; OR 1.21, 95% CI: 0.65-2.26; interaction p=0.009). CONCLUSIONS: In participants undergoing coronary procedures by TFA, US guidance decreased the composite outcome of major vascular complications or bleeding and may be especially helpful when using vascular closure devices.

Phenotyping the Responses to Systemic Corticosteroids in the Management of Asthma Attacks (PRISMA): protocol for an observational and translational pilot study.

INTRODUCTION: Asthma and its associated exacerbation are heterogeneous. Although severe asthma attacks are systematically prescribed corticosteroids and often antibiotics, little is known about the variability of response to these therapies. Blood eosinophils and fractional exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO) are type 2 inflammation biomarkers that have established mechanistic, prognostic and theragnostic values in chronic asthma, but their utility in acute asthma is unclear. We speculate that the clinical and biological response to those treatments varies according to inflammometry and microbiological test results. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: An observational longitudinal pilot study with multimodal clinical and translational assessments will be performed on 50 physician-diagnosed ≥12-year-old asthmatics presenting with an asthma attack and 12 healthy controls, including blood eosinophil count (venous and point-of-care (POC) capillary blood), FeNO and testing for airway infection (sputum cultures and POC nasopharyngeal swabs). People with asthma will be assessed on day 0 and after a 7-day corticosteroid course, with home monitoring performed in between. The primary analysis will be the change in the forced expiratory volume in 1 s according to type 2 inflammatory status (blood eosinophils ≥0.15×109/L and/or FeNO ≥25 ppb) after treatment. Key secondary analyses will compare changes in symptom scores and the proportion of patients achieving a minimal clinically important difference. Exploratory analyses will assess the relationship between clinical, lung function, inflammatory and microbiome parameters; satisfaction plus reliability indices of POC tests; and sex-gender variability in treatment response. Ultimately, this pilot study will serve to plan a larger trial comparing the clinical and biological response to systemic corticosteroids according to inflammatory biomarkers, offering valuable guidance for more personalised therapeutic strategies in asthma attacks. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The protocol has been approved by the Research Ethics Committee of the CIUSSS de l'Estrie-CHUS, Sherbrooke, Quebec, Canada (#2023-4687). Results will be communicated in an international meeting and submitted to a peer-reviewed journal. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ClinicalTrials.gov Registry (NCT05870215).

SARS-CoV-2 spike antigen-specific B cell and antibody responses in pre-vaccination period COVID-19 convalescent males and females with or without post-covid condition.

Background: Following SARS-CoV-2 infection a significant proportion of convalescent individuals develop the post-COVID condition (PCC) that is characterized by wide spectrum of symptoms encompassing various organs. Even though the underlying pathophysiology of PCC is not known, detection of viral transcripts and antigens in tissues other than lungs raise the possibility that PCC may be a consequence of aberrant immune response to the viral antigens. To test this hypothesis, we evaluated B cell and antibody responses to the SARS-CoV-2 antigens in PCC patients who experienced mild COVID-19 disease during the pre-vaccination period of COVID-19 pandemic. Methods: The study subjects included unvaccinated male and female subjects who developed PCC or not (No-PCC) after clearing RT-PCR confirmed mild COVID-19 infection. SARS-CoV-2 D614G and omicron RBD specific B cell subsets in peripheral circulation were assessed by flow cytometry. IgG, IgG3 and IgA antibody titers toward RBD, spike and nucleocapsid antigens in the plasma were evaluated by ELISA. Results: The frequency of the B cells specific to D614G-RBD were comparable in convalescent groups with and without PCC in both males and females. Notably, in females with PCC, the anti-D614G RBD specific double negative (IgD-CD27-) B cells showed significant correlation with the number of symptoms at acute of infection. Anti-spike antibody responses were also higher at 3 months post-infection in females who developed PCC, but not in the male PCC group. On the other hand, the male PCC group also showed consistently high anti-RBD IgG responses compared to all other groups. Conclusions: The antibody responses to the spike protein, but not the anti-RBD B cell responses diverge between convalescent males and females who develop PCC. Our findings also suggest that sex-related factors may also be involved in the development of PCC via modulating antibody responses to the SARS-CoV-2 antigens.

No-reflow after primary percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction: an angiographic core laboratory analysis of the TOTAL Trial.

BACKGROUND: The optimal strategy to prevent no-reflow in ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is unknown. AIMS: We aimed to examine the effect of thrombectomy on the outcome of no-reflow in key subgroups and the adverse clinical outcomes associated with no-reflow. METHODS: We performed a post hoc analysis of the TOTAL Trial, a randomised trial of 10,732 patients comparing thrombectomy versus PCI alone. This analysis utilised the angiographic data of 1,800 randomly selected patients. RESULTS: No-reflow was diagnosed in 196 of 1,800 eligible patients (10.9%). No-reflow occurred in 95/891 (10.7%) patients randomised to thrombectomy compared with 101/909 (11.1%) in the PCI-alone arm (odds ratio [OR] 0.95, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.71-1.28; p-value=0.76). In the subgroup of patients who underwent direct stenting, those randomised to thrombectomy compared with PCI alone experienced less no-reflow (19/371 [5.1%] vs 21/216 [9.7%], OR 0.50, 95% CI: 0.26-0.96). In patients who did not undergo direct stenting, there was no difference between the groups (64/504 [12.7%] vs 75/686 [10.9%)], OR 1.18, 95% CI: 0.82-1.69; interaction p-value=0.02). No-reflow patients had a significantly increased risk of experiencing the primary composite outcome (cardiovascular death, recurrent myocardial infarction, cardiogenic shock, or NYHA Class IV heart failure) at 1 year (adjusted hazard ratio 1.70, 95% CI: 1.13-2.56; p-value=0.01). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with STEMI treated by PCI, thrombectomy did not reduce no-reflow in all patients but may be synergistic with direct stenting. No-reflow is associated with increased adverse clinical outcomes.

Trajectories of health-related quality of life and their predictors in adult COVID-19 survivors: A longitudinal analysis of the Biobanque Québécoise de la COVID-19 (BQC-19).

PURPOSE: A significant number of people will experience prolonged symptoms after COVID-19 infection that will greatly impact functional capacity and quality of life. The aim of this study was to identify trajectories of health-related quality of life (HRQOL) and their predictors among adults diagnosed with COVID-19. METHODS: This is a retrospective analysis of an ongoing prospective cohort study (BQC-19) including adults (≥18y) recruited from April 2020 to March 2022. Our primary outcome is HRQOL using the EQ-5D-5L scale. Sociodemographic, acute disease severity, vaccination status, fatigue, and functional status at onset of the disease were considered as potential predictors. The latent class mixed model was used to identify the trajectories over an 18-month period in the cohort as a whole, as well as in the inpatient and outpatient subgroups. Multivariable and univariable regressions models were undertaken to detect predictors of decline. RESULTS: 2163 participants were included. Thirteen percent of the outpatient subgroup (2 classes) and 28% in the inpatient subgroup (3 classes) experienced a more significant decline in HRQOL over time than the rest of the participants. Among all patients, age, sex, disease severity and fatigue, measured on the first assessment visit or on the first day after hospital admission (multivariable models), were identified as the most important predictors of HRQOL decline. Each unit increase in the SARC-F and CFS scores increase the likelihood of belonging to the declining trajectory (univariable models). CONCLUSION: Although to different degrees, similar factors explain the decline in HRQOL over time among the overall population, people who have been hospitalized or not. Clinical functional capacity scales could help to determine the risk of HRQOL decline.

SARS-CoV-2 infection outcomes associated with the Delta variant: A prospective cohort study.

Background: It is well established that fully vaccinated (≥2 doses) individuals may develop COVID-19. However, little is known about the specific prevalence of post-COVID-19 conditions associated with the Delta variant or the effect of vaccination on post-acute outcomes of COVID-19. In addition, how Delta variant infection severity compares in fully vaccinated individuals versus in those unvaccinated is unknown. Methods: This prospective single-centre observational cohort study assessed adults with SARS-CoV-2 proven infection from August 1 to November 1, 2021. Study participants were enrolled in the Biobanque Québécoise de la COVID-19. Data on demographics, comorbidities, and severity of COVID-19 were collected. Simple and multiple logistic regressions were used to identify risk factors for post-COVID-19 conditions. Results: Among the 395 individuals who were interviewed by phone, 138 (39.4%) agreed to participate. Of the 138 participants, 62.8% were Delta-associated breakthrough infections that occurred in fully vaccinated individuals and 37.1% in unvaccinated individuals. The majority (93.5%) had a history of mild COVID-19 illness. The prevalence of Delta-variant-associated post-COVID-19 conditions was similar in both vaccinated (61.4%) and unvaccinated (51.4%) groups (p = 0.347). The number of symptoms during acute infection was an independent risk factor for post-COVID-19 conditions. Conclusions: This study is the first to describe the incidence of Delta-associated post-COVID-19 condition. In this study, COVID-19 vaccination was not associated with decreased post-COVID-19 conditions in patients with breakthrough Delta infection. These findings have important implications for provincial services planning and underscore the need to develop alternative strategies to prevent post-COVID-19 conditions.

Historique: Il est bien établi que les personnes pleinement vaccinées (au moins deux doses) peuvent contracter la COVID-19. Cependant, on sait peu de choses sur la prévalence exacte des affections post-COVID-19 associées au variant Delta et sur l'effet de la vaccination sur les résultats post-aigus de la COVID-19. Par ailleurs, on ne sait pas quelle est la gravité de l'infection par le variant Delta chez les personnes pleinement vaccinées par rapport à celles qui ne le sont pas. Méthodologie: La présente étude de cohorte observationnelle unicentrique et prospective visait à évaluer des adultes atteints d'une infection démontrée par le SRAS-CoV-2 entre le 1er aoÛt et le 1er novembre 2021. Les participants à l'étude étaient inscrits à la Biobanque québécoise de la COVID-19. Les chercheurs ont recueilli les données sur les caractéristiques démographiques, les affections connexes et la gravité de la COVID-19. Ils ont utilisé la régression logistique simple et multiple pour déterminer les facteurs de risque d'affections post-COVID-19. Résultats: Des 395 personnes interviewées par téléphone, 138 (39,4%) ont accepté de participer. De ce nombre, 62,8% étaient des personnes pleinement vaccinées qui avaient souffert d'une infection postvaccinale par le variant Delta et 37,1%, des personnes non vaccinées. La majorité (93,5%) avait une histoire de COVID-19 légère. La prévalence d'affections post-COVID-19 liées au variant Delta était semblable dans les groupes vaccinés (61,4% [48,4%­73%]) et non vaccinés (51,4% [35,6%­67%]; p = 0,347. Le nombre de symptômes pendant l'infection aiguë était un facteur de risque indépendant d'affections post-COVID-19. Conclusions: La présente étude est la première à décrire l'incidence d'affections post-COVID-19 liées au variant Delta. La vaccination contre la COVID-19 n'était pas liée à une diminution d'affections post-COVID-19 chez les patients atteints d'une infection postvaccinale par le variant Delta. Ces observations ont des conséquences importantes pour la planification des services provinciaux et font ressortir la nécessité de trouver d'autres stratégies pour éviter les affections post-COVID-19.

Prevalence of persistent symptoms at least 1 month after SARS-CoV-2 Omicron infection in adults.

Background: Persistent post-COVID-19 symptoms pose an important health care burden. The Omicron variant has rapidly spread across the world and infected millions of people, largely exceeding previous variants. The potential for many of these people to develop persistent symptoms is a major public health concern. The aim of this study was to determine the prevalence and risk factors of post-COVID-19 symptoms associated with Omicron. Methods: We conducted a single-centre prospective observational study in Quebec, Canada, between December 2021 and April 2022. Participants were adults enrolled in the Biobanque Québécoise de la COVID-19 (BQC19). Cases were considered Omicron cases as more than 85% were estimated to be attributable to Omicron variant during that period. Adults with polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-confirmed COVID-19 were recruited at least 4 weeks after the onset of infection. Results: Of 1,338 individuals contacted, 290 (21.7%) participants were recruited in BQC19 during that period. Median duration between the initial PCR test and follow-up was 44 days (IQR 31-56 d). A total of 137 (47.2%) participants reported symptoms at least 1-month post-infection. The majority (98.6%) had a history of mild COVID-19 illness. Most common persistent symptoms included fatigue (48.2%), shortness of breath (32.6%), and cough (24.1%). Number of symptoms during acute COVID-19 was identified as a risk factor for post-COVID-19 symptoms (OR 1.07 [95% CI 1.03% to 1.10%] p = 0.009). Conclusions: This is the first study reporting the prevalence of post-COVID-19 symptoms associated with Omicron in Canada. These findings will have important implications for provincial services planning.

Historique: Les symptômes post-COVID-19 persistants représentent un fardeau important pour la santé. Le variant Omicron s'est propagé rapidement dans le monde et a infecté des milliers de personnes, un nombre largement supérieur aux variants qui l'avaient précédé. Le risque que bon nombre d'entre elles acquièrent des symptômes persistants est un problème sanitaire majeur. La présente étude visait à déterminer la prévalence et les facteurs de risques de symptômes post-COVID-19 liés au variant Omicron. Méthodologie: Les chercheurs ont réalisé une étude observationnelle monocentrique à Québec, au Canada, entre décembre 2021 et avril 2022. Les participants étaient des adultes inscrits à la Biobanque québécoise de la COVID-19 (BQC19). Les cas étaient considérés comme découler du variant Omicron parce que plus de 85% étaient estimés y être attribuables pendant cette période. Les adultes atteints d'une COVID-19 confirmée par un test d'amplification en chaîne par polymérase (PCR) ont été recrutés au moins quatre semaines après l'apparition de l'infection. Résultats: Des 1 338 personnes contactées, 290 (21,7%) ont été recrutées dans la BQC19 pendant cette période. La période moyenne entre le test PCR initial et le suivi était de 44 jours (ÉIQ: de 31 à 56 jours). Au total, 137 participants (47,2%) ont déclaré des symptômes au moins un mois après l'infection. La majorité avait été atteinte d'une COVID-19 légère. Les symptômes les plus persistants étaient la fatigue (48,2%), l'essoufflement (32,6%) et la toux (24,1%). Il a été établi que le nombre de symptômes pendant la COVID-19 aiguë (rapport de cotes: 1,07, IC à 95% 1,03% à 1,10%; p = 0,009) était un facteur de risque de symptômes post-COVID-19. Conclusions: La présente étude est la première à rendre compte de la prévalence de symptômes post-COVID-19 associés au variant Omicron au Canada. Ces observations auront des conséquences importantes pour la planification des services provinciaux.

Transition to endemic: acceptance of additional COVID-19 vaccine doses among Canadian adults in a national cross-sectional survey.

BACKGROUND: Additional doses of COVID-19 vaccine have been proposed as solutions to waning immunity and decreased effectiveness of primary doses against infection with new SARS-CoV-2 variants. However, the effectiveness of additional vaccine doses relies on widespread population acceptance. We aimed to assess the acceptance of additional COVID-19 vaccine doses (third and annual doses) among Canadian adults and determine associated factors. METHODS: We conducted a national, cross-sectional online survey among Canadian adults from October 14 to November 12, 2021. Weighted multinomial logistic regression analyses were used to identify sociodemographic and health-related factors associated with third and annual dose acceptance and indecision, compared to refusal. We also assessed influences on vaccine decision-making, and preferences for future vaccine delivery. RESULTS: Of 6010 respondents, 70% reported they would accept a third dose, while 15.2% were undecided. For annual doses, 64% reported acceptance, while 17.5% were undecided. Factors associated with third dose acceptance and indecision were similar to those associated with annual dose acceptance and indecision. Previous COVID-19 vaccine receipt, no history of COVID-19 disease, intention to receive an influenza vaccine, and increasing age were strongly associated with both acceptance and indecision. Chronic illness was associated with higher odds of acceptance, while self-reported disability was associated with higher odds of being undecided. Higher education attainment and higher income were associated with higher odds of accepting additional doses. Minority first language was associated with being undecided about additional doses, while visible minority identity was associated with being undecided about a third dose and refusing an annual dose. All respondents reported government recommendations were an important influence on their decision-making and identified pharmacy-based delivery and drop-in appointments as desirable. Co-administration of COVID-19 and influenza vaccines was viewed positively by 75.5% of the dose 3 acceptance group, 12.3% of the undecided group, and 8.4% of the refusal group. CONCLUSIONS: To increase acceptance, targeted interventions among visible minority and minority language populations, and those with a disability, are required. Offering vaccination at pharmacies and through drop-in appointments are important to facilitate uptake, while offering COVID-19/influenza vaccine co-administration may have little benefit among those undecided about additional doses.

Parents' perceptions on COVID-19 vaccination as the new routine for their children ≤ 11 years old.

Canadian children 5-11 years old became eligible for COVID-19 vaccination on November 19, 2021, with eligibility for younger children expected later. We aimed to descriptively assess parents' COVID-19 vaccine intentions and acceptability of future doses, including co-administration and annual vaccination for their children. We conducted a cross-sectional Canadian online survey of parents from October 14-November 12, 2021, just prior to authorization of the pediatric formulation of the BNT162b2 COVID-19 vaccine for children aged 5-11 years. We assessed parents' intention to vaccinate their children aged 5-11 years, 2-4 years, and 6-23 months; reasons for their intention; and preferences for delivery and access to vaccines. Of 1129 parents, 56% intended to vaccinate their child aged 5-11 years against COVID-19; intentions were lower for children aged 6-23 months (41.9%) and 2-4 years (45.4%). Most parents who intended to vaccinate supported co-administration with routine (61.1%) or influenza (55.4%) vaccines, administration at school (63.6%), receipt of booster doses of COVID-19 vaccine (57.8%), and annual vaccination (56.4%) for their child. Despite parents' high COVID-19 vaccination uptake for themselves (88.8%), intentions for children aged 5-11 years was low. Currently, 56.9% of Canadian children aged 5-11 years have received one dose of a COVID-19 vaccine, and only 37.1% are fully vaccinated. Given that intentions for children <5 years was lower than those 5-11 years, we can also expect low uptake in this group. Parents' preferences regarding delivery and access to COVID-19 vaccination should be considered by public health officials when planning vaccination strategies for children.

Longitudinal changes in sputum and blood inflammatory mediators during FeNO suppression testing.

To explore whether fractional exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO) non-suppression identifies corticosteroid resistance, we analysed inflammatory mediator changes during a FeNO suppression test with monitored high-intensity corticosteroid therapy. In linear mixed-effects models analysed over time, the 15 clinically distinct 'suppressors' (ie, ≥42% FeNO suppression) normalised Asthma Control Questionnaire scores (mean±SD, start to end of test: 2.8±1.4 to 1.4±0.9, p<0.0001) and sputum eosinophil counts (median (IQR), start to end of test: 29% (6%-41%) to 1% (1%-5%), p=0.0003) while significantly decreasing sputum prostaglandin D2 (254 (89-894) to 93 (49-209) pg/mL, p=0.004) and numerically decreasing other type-2 cytokine, chemokine and alarmin levels. In comparison, the 19 non-suppressors had persistent sputum eosinophilia (10% (1%-67%) despite high-intensity therapy) with raised end-test inflammatory mediator levels (1.9 (0.9-2.8)-fold greater than suppressors). FeNO non-suppression during monitored treatment implies biological corticosteroid resistance.

COVID-19 vaccine uptake and intention during pregnancy in Canada.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate COVID-19 vaccine uptake and intent among pregnant people in Canada, and determine associated factors. METHODS: We conducted a national cross-sectional survey among pregnant people from May 28 through June 7, 2021 (n = 193). Respondents completed a questionnaire to determine COVID-19 vaccine acceptance (defined as either received or intend to receive a COVID-19 vaccine during pregnancy), factors associated with vaccine acceptance, and rationale for accepting/not accepting the vaccine. RESULTS: Of 193 respondents, 57.5% (n = 111) reported COVID-19 vaccine acceptance. Among those who did not accept the vaccine, concern over vaccine safety was the most commonly cited reason (90.1%, n = 73), and 81.7% (n = 67) disagreed with receiving a vaccine that had not been tested in pregnant people. Confidence in COVID-19 vaccine safety (aOR 16.72, 95% CI: 7.22, 42.39), Indigenous self-identification (aOR 11.59, 95% CI: 1.77, 117.18), and employment in an occupation at high risk for COVID-19 exposure excluding healthcare (aOR 4.76, 95% CI: 1.32, 18.60) were associated with vaccine acceptance. Perceived personal risk of COVID-19 disease was not associated with vaccine acceptance in the multivariate model. CONCLUSION: Vaccine safety is a primary concern for this population. Safety information should be communicated to this population as it emerges, along with clear messaging on the benefits of vaccination, as disease risk is either poorly understood or poorly valued in this population.

RéSUMé: OBJECTIF: Examiner l'intention de se faire vacciner contre la COVID-19 et l'adoption du vaccin anti-COVID-19 chez les personnes enceintes au Canada, et déterminer les facteurs associés. MéTHODE: Du 28 mai au 7 juin 2021, nous avons mené un sondage transversal national auprès de personnes enceintes (n = 193). Les répondantes ont rempli un questionnaire pour nous permettre de déterminer l'acceptation du vaccin contre la COVID-19 (définie comme le fait d'avoir reçu ou l'intention de recevoir un vaccin anti-COVID-19 durant la grossesse), les facteurs associés à l'acceptation du vaccin et les motifs d'acceptation ou de refus du vaccin. RéSULTATS: Sur les 193 répondantes, 57,5 % (n = 111) ont dit accepter le vaccin contre la COVID-19. Chez celles qui n'acceptaient pas le vaccin, l'inquiétude face à son innocuité était la raison la plus souvent citée (90,1 %, n = 73), et 81,7 % (n = 67) n'acceptaient pas de recevoir un vaccin qui n'avait pas été testé sur des personnes enceintes. La confiance en l'innocuité du vaccin anti-COVID-19 (RCa 16,72, IC de 95 % : 7,22, 42,39), l'auto-identification en tant que personne autochtone (RCa 11,59, IC de 95 % : 1,77, 117,18) et l'emploi dans une profession à risque élevé d'exposition à la COVID-19, sauf les soins de santé (RCa 4,76, IC de 95 % : 1,32, 18,60) étaient associés à l'acceptation du vaccin. Le risque personnel perçu de tomber malade de la COVID-19 n'était pas associé à l'acceptation du vaccin dans notre modèle multivarié. CONCLUSION: L'innocuité du vaccin est une préoccupation majeure dans cette population. Des informations sur l'innocuité devraient être communiquées aux personnes enceintes au fur et à mesure qu'elles sont connues, ainsi que des messages clairs sur les avantages de la vaccination, car le risque de maladie est soit mal compris, soit déconsidéré dans cette population.

Canadian parents' perceptions of COVID-19 vaccination and intention to vaccinate their children: Results from a cross-sectional national survey.

BACKGROUND: Vaccinating children (≤17 years old) is important for controlling the COVID-19 pandemic. As parents are primary decision makers for their children, we aimed to assess parents' perceptions and intentions regarding COVID-19 vaccination for their children, including for some underserved populations (e.g., newcomers, Indigenous peoples, and visible minority groups). METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional national survey of Canadian parents in December 2020, just as COVID-19 vaccines were approved for adults, to assess intention to vaccinate their children (aged 0-17 years) against COVID-19, perceptions of COVID-19 disease and vaccines, previous uptake of influenza and routine vaccines, and sociodemographic characteristics. Binomial logistic regression was used to assess the association between parents' lack of COVID-19 vaccination intention for their children and various independent variables. RESULTS: Sixty-three percent of parents (1074/1702) intended to vaccinate their children against COVID-19. Those employed part-time (compared to full-time) had lower intention to vaccinate their children (aOR = 1.73, 95% CI: 1.06-2.84), while those who spoke languages other than English, French, or Indigenous languages were less likely to have low intention (aOR = 0.55, 95% CI: 0.32-0.92). Low vaccination intention was also associated with children not receiving influenza vaccine pre-pandemic (aOR = 1.51, 95% CI: 1.04-2.21), parents having low intention to vaccinate themselves against COVID-19 (aOR = 9.22, 95% CI: 6.43-13.34), believing COVID-19 vaccination is unnecessary (aOR = 2.59, 95% CI: 1.72-3.91) or unsafe (aOR = 4.21, 95% CI: 2.96-5.99), and opposing COVID-19 vaccine use in children without prior testing (aOR = 3.09, 95% CI: 1.87-5.24). INTERPRETATION: Parents' COVID-19 vaccination intentions for their children are better predicted by previous decisions regarding influenza vaccination than routine childhood vaccines, and other perceptions of COVID-19 vaccine-related factors. Public communication should highlight the safety and necessity of COVID-19 vaccination in children to support a return to normal activities. Further research should assess actual COVID-19 vaccination uptake in children, particularly for underserved populations.

The feasibility, reliability, and incremental value of two-dimensional speckle-tracking for the detection of significant coronary stenosis after treadmill stress echocardiography.

BACKGROUND: Two-dimensional speckle-tracking echocardiography (STE) may help detect coronary artery disease (CAD) when combined with dobutamine stress echocardiography. However, few studies have explored STE with exercise stress echocardiography (ESE). We aimed to evaluate the feasibility, reliability, and incremental value of STE combined with treadmill ESE compared to treadmill ESE alone to detect CAD. METHODS: We conducted a case-control study of all consecutive patients with abnormal ESE in 2018-2020 who subsequently underwent coronary angiography within a six-month interval. We 1:1 propensity score-matched these patients to those with a normal ESE. Two blinded operators generated a 17-segment bull's-eye map of longitudinal strain (LS). We utilized the mean differences between stress and baseline LS values in segments 13-17, segment 17, and segments 15-16 to create receiver operator curves for the overall examination, the left anterior descending artery (LAD), and the non-LAD territories, respectively. RESULTS: We excluded 61 STEs from 201 (30.3%) eligible ESEs; 47 (23.4%) because of suboptimal image quality and 14 (7.0%) because of excessive heart rate variability precluding the calculation of a bull's-eye map. After matching, a total of 102 patients were included (51 patients in each group). In the group with abnormal ESE patients (mean age 66.4 years, 39.2% female), 64.7% had significant CAD (> 70% stenosis) at coronary angiogram. In the group with normal ESE patients (mean age 65.1 years, 35.3% female), 3.9% were diagnosed with a new significant coronary stenosis within one year. The intra-class correlation for global LS was 0.87 at rest and 0.92 at stress, and 0.84 at rest, and 0.89 at stress for the apical segments. The diagnostic accuracy of combining ESE and STE was superior to visual assessment alone for the overall examination (area under the curve (AUC) = 0.89 vs. 0.84, p = 0.025), the non-LAD territory (AUC = 0.83 vs. 0.70, p = 0.006), but not the LAD territory (AUC = 0.79 vs. 0.73, p = 0.11). CONCLUSIONS: Two-dimensional speckle-tracking combined with treadmill ESE is relatively feasible, reliable, and may provide incremental diagnostic value for the detection and localization of significant CAD.

Racial Disparities in Acute Coronary Syndrome Management Within a Universal Healthcare Context: Insights From the AMI-OPTIMA Trial.

BACKGROUND: Although prior studies have demonstrated racial disparities regarding acute coronary syndrome (ACS) care within private or mixed healthcare systems, few researchers have explored such disparities within universal healthcare systems. We aimed to evaluate the quality and outcomes of in-hospital ACS management for White patients vs patients of colour, within a universal healthcare context. METHODS: We performed a post hoc analysis of the Acute Myocardial Infarction - Knowledge Translation to Optimize Adherence to Evidence-Based Therapy study, a cluster-randomized trial evaluating a knowledge-translation intervention at 24 hospitals in Quebec, Canada (years: 2009 and 2012). The primary endpoint was coronary catheterization. The secondary endpoints included in-hospital mortality, percutaneous and surgical coronary revascularization, major bleeding, total stroke, and discharge prescription of evidence-based medical therapy. RESULTS: Of 3444 included patients, 2738 were White, and 706 were people of colour. The mean age was 68.2 years (33.3% women) among White patients and 69.5 years (36.0% women) among patients of colour. Patients of colour were less likely to undergo in-hospital coronary catheterization than were White patients (74.5% vs 80.3%, P = 0.001). This difference was attenuated after adjusting for patient-level characteristics (odds ratio 0.89; 95% confidence interval 0.73-1.09), and it was eliminated after adjusting for hospital-level characteristics (odds ratio 1.04; 95% confidence interval 0.73-1.49). CONCLUSIONS: Racial disparity in coronary catheterization for ACS persists within a universal healthcare context. Patients' comorbidities and hospital-level factors may be partially responsible for this inequality. Future research on cardiovascular healthcare in patients with diverse racial/ethnic backgrounds in universal healthcare systems is needed to remediate racial inequality in ACS management.

CONTEXTE: Bien que des études antérieures aient démontré l'existence de disparités raciales dans la prise en charge du syndrome coronarien aigu (SCA) au sein de systèmes de santé privés ou mixtes, peu de chercheurs ont étudié ces disparités au sein de systèmes universels de soins de santé. Nous avons cherché à évaluer la qualité et les résultats de la prise en charge du SCA à l'hôpital pour les patients blancs par rapport aux patients de couleur, dans un contexte de soins de santé universels. MÉTHODOLOGIE: Nous avons effectué une analyse a posteriori de l'étude AMI-OPTIMA, un essai sur échantillon en grappes aléatoire évaluant une intervention d'application des connaissances dans 24 hôpitaux du Québec, au Canada (années : 2009 et 2012). Le paramètre d'évaluation principal était le cathétérisme coronaire. Les paramètres d'évaluation secondaires comprenaient la mortalité à l'hôpital, la revascularisation coronaire percutanée et chirurgicale, l'hémorragie majeure, l'accident vasculaire cérébral et la prescription au congé d'un traitement médical fondé sur des données probantes. RÉSULTATS: Sur les 3444 patients étudiés, 2738 étaient blancs et 706 étaient des personnes de couleur. L'âge moyen était de 68,2 ans (33,3 % de femmes) chez les patients blancs, et de 69,5 ans (36,0 % de femmes) chez les patients de couleur. Les patients de couleur étaient moins susceptibles de subir un cathétérisme coronaire à l'hôpital que les patients blancs (74,5 % contre 80,3 %, p = 0,001). Cette différence a été atténuée après ajustement pour tenir compte des caractéristiques des patients (rapport de cotes : 0,89; intervalle de confiance [IC] à 95 % : 0,73-1,09), et éliminée après ajustement pour tenir compte des caractéristiques des hôpitaux (rapport de cotes : 1,04; IC à 95 % : 0,73-1,49). CONCLUSIONS: La disparité raciale en ce qui a trait au cathétérisme coronaire pour un SCA persiste dans un contexte de soins de santé universels. Les comorbidités des patients et des facteurs liés à l'hôpital peuvent être partiellement responsables de cette inégalité. De plus amples recherches sur les soins cardiovasculaires chez les patients de diverses origines raciales ou ethniques dans les systèmes universels de soins de santé sont nécessaires pour remédier aux inégalités raciales dans la prise en charge du SCA.